In the recent timeline, Chat GPT has made a hot and successful appearance in the computing industry. This AI program uses textual data to deliver accurate responses to almost anything you ask including programming codes.
Can Chat GPT Replace Programmers?
Chat GPT is widely used as a chatbot and has pretty wild capabilities. This ranges from answering queries, generating ideas, and doing programming. However, there are pretty low chances that Chat GPT will ever replace programmers.
This led to the possibility of Chat GPT entirely replacing the programmers and developers, maybe soon. But, is it really possible? Well, to answer your question, we need to look at the power of this Open AI program in terms of performing coding and programming.
Future of Chat GPT in the Programming Sector
If you’re a programmer and thinking if Chat GPT can replace your job, you’re not alone. Chat GPT is an amazing invention that can take the power of AI to new heights. However, it will not be able to replace programmers due to several limitations.
Before discussing what Chat GPT is lacking in the computing domain, let’s look at what Chat GPT can do. Of course, Chat GPT is efficient enough to do basic code generation. It is also possible to find the solutions to the commonly occurring bugs in a developed code.
The main reason why Chat GPT is not ready for programming is the lack of flexibility. This AI tool uses existing data to perform tasks and is therefore unable to work around the programming languages.
Programming Knowledge Limitation of Chat GPT
There is a big difference between the knowledge and expertise of programmers and AI. First of all, Chat GPT is unable to comprehend the programming-specific knowledge it requires to efficiently generate desired codes.
Secondly, the human brain works based on innovations and creativity. These factors are required when you need to go beyond the bubble to develop a program. Programmers can devise problem-solving skills and implement that specific knowledge better than Chat GPT.
Practical Idea Generation & Chat GPT
Another biggest limitation of Chat GPT is the lack of practicality in applying what it generates. No doubt, this AI program can be creative but it is very unlikely that the result can be implemented in practice always.
Unlike Chat GPT, programmers can think and produce solutions out of the box. A human brain can search and analyze all the possibilities to form a practical and much feasible solution. At the same time, programmers can make sure the solution must be feasible for programming.
Code Understanding & Execution
While it is possible that Chat GPT can do basic computing and develop small codes and snippets, it can’t replace programmers. Chat GPT is a text-based AI and no matter if it can write codes, it doesn’t know if the generated code is executable or not.
Similarly, it is very unlikely that the Chat GPT can even understand the working of generated codes. Programmers are more devoted to understanding and implementing written codes. At the same time, they are also efficient to debug no matter in what language the code is.
Lack of Quality Check in Programming
Chat GPT can replicate a brain but it cannot be a human brain itself. It is a language generator that needs to stay constantly updated through maintenance and updates. There is a big difference between complex and high-quality code generated by AI and humans.
Even if Chat GPT will write the data and codes in the future, it will lack quality control. The data AI programs provide still needs to be examined and verified by programmers before execution.
Programming Complexity & Chat GPT Limitations
Chat GPT can undoubtedly answer anything but this program has a big critical thinking limitation. The human brain is still efficient enough to solve problems, unlike the Chat GPT’s AI which is limited to the existing data.
Chat GPT is not trained enough to understand and think based on the situation. While developers and programmers face these problems every day and can better comprehend the best possible solutions.
This leaves Chat GPT way behind in taking the jobs of programmers and code developers. Chat GPT is fun to use and can write codes but it cannot think the way the brain is. Similarly, complex systems and programs cannot be controlled and regulated by Chat GPT.
The AI programs cannot match the invaluable experience delivered by programmers in the long run. Programmers can better understand the user needs and develop the systems and applications based on the ease of users.
In my opinion, the use of Chat GPT is interesting in the programming domain but its output is not reliable. Chat GPT is unable to integrate itself with the systems present at the moment in the tech world.
Besides, there is a bigger risk of using its responses in production systems. The AI is fast but is not secure enough to deliver data that can be implemented in complex tasks. However, Chat GPT can ease the workload of programmers in several ways.
The Automation Capability of Chat GPT
Now you know Chat GPT cannot go beyond the creativity of a programmer’s brain. But, Chat GPT is still helpful in many ways concerning generating codes. It can shorten the time of a programmer or the person using the AI for programming and coding purposes.
For instance, Chat GPT can write test cases and documentation of the process. It can also develop short code snippets programmers can use during the development of specific programs.
In my opinion, this will be a great help for the developers and reduce the time consumption to go through all these extra processes. At the end of the day, it certainly cannot replace the job of programmers but can assist them by increasing their productivity.
Chat GPT cannot simply replace programmers because it lacks productive abilities. However, programmers must make use of this AI technology to help them counter emerging problems in the programming world.
By using programs like Chat GPT, a programmer can shorten their time consumption and work proficiently. Chat GPT lacks the basic sense of code understanding, execution, and implementation, making it a safe option and not a threat to programmers.